Why Privacy Matters. . .

Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge of the 9th Circuit, co-authored an excellent piece mourning the death of the 4th Amendment. His principle observation? We have voluntarily joined loyalty card programs, online retailer account programs, electronic toll passes, and smartphone accounts. Consequently, all information regarding our shopping, travel habits, even web history is considered “public.” This enables police to mine this data willy-nilly.

But wait, you say: Judge Kozinski is crying wolf, the only people with anything to fear are criminals. Actually, Judge Kozinski is one of the most intelligent, technologically savvy people on the bench today. I can only imagine that his co-author & law clerk, Stephanie Grace, is like minded. They mention a case in 2004 where police arrested firefighter Philip Scott Lyons for arson “after discovering he purchased a fire starter with his Safeway Club Card. The charges weren’t dropped until someone else confessed; not everyone will be so lucky.”

I have no qualms about marketers having a better understanding of who I am so that they can target me with more appropriate products. I am greatly concerned about the police–or other people who I have not specifically authorized–accessing the same.

Perhaps it is time for me to update my “reasonable expectation of privacy.”

A redesign? Theory and Explanation

I originally intended to use this space to record my food-related endeavors, it quickly morphed into a convenient means to update friends and family about my life.  Not only could any web browser access this eponymous address, but I could maintain some sense of control over the site’s content (unlike, for example, Facebook). I saw obscurity and responsible posting as the primary means of protecting those whom I might mention.

Continue reading

Another Privacy Problem with Facebook

You might have thought that after their new privacy controls debacle, Facebook would have carefully checked the layout of their latest innovation privacy destroying tool, “facebook places,” before launch. You would be naive.

The latest update to the site I joined to share silly photos with friends-far from the prying eyes of employers and parents-now shares your location whenever you “check in” (read a message, accidentally leave the app open, etc.)

How convenient! Now everyone can know that you went to the opera… Or that when you called in sick, you were at the ball game. Or that you skipped church to go to Dawkin’s lecture.

But wait, you say, Ted is a Luddite. Facebook offers improved privacy controls. If you have your boss on limited profile, she might not get that update. And, better yet, you can just turn off places. Sure, it won’t help you in that last example, but you’ll be safe from getting caught playing hookie.

Wrong.

Your coworker didn’t turn off places and you haven’t restricted him from being able to share your info. It appears as though your coworker’s update may automatically share your location with the boss.

But you thought that after the last round of privacy mistakes that facebook would have tied the “no places” setting to the friends can’t share places setting? You thought wrong.

It’s time for another round of “find the right facebook settings” game. Hope you enjoy playing!