Michael Lind‘s piece, “The bankruptcy of the New Democrat Ideology,” employs the same logical fallacies used by the Right: mixing ad-hominem attacks with legitimate critique. Far more insidious than Rush‘s “entertainment” (unsourced, illogical statements of anger, said to inflame those who fall prey to its overly simplistic worldview), when Liberals/Progressives/Democrats/Independents/Reasonable People do this to each other, we destroy any chance of positive political action*. This has got to stop.
Category Archives: Politics
The Cost of Higher Education: Resources and Concerns
I am not a student loan expert. I am not an education policy wonk. I am not an economist.
I am, however, a student loan debtor, a law school grad, and having difficulty finding enough work. Many other Americans find themselves in similar circumstances, and while President Obama signed student loan reform legislation this spring to help some ex-students (and a far greater percentage of those currently enrolled), not everyone is eligible and the programs can be confusing. A number of people contacted me after the town hall offering advice on student loans. Beyond the link, I have tried to consolidate the information we discussed and hope that it proves useful to current student-borrowers and those contemplating future educational debt.
Seeking inspiration?
10.2.10 One Nation Working Together marches marched on the Mall at noon. Positive message, inclusive message, hopeful message. . .
Everyone in America deserves a just and fair chance to achieve the American Dream. Our national identity is rooted in the ideal that all people – regardless of race, ethnicity, class, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity or expression, or ability – should have the opportunity to fulfill their potential and contribute to an economy that works for everyone.
On Supporting President Obama
And all of us have to have a conversation. . . . and we’ve got to do so at a time when the economy is in a tough situation.
President Barack Obama, 20 September 2010
Our world is complicated. Even limiting the scope of inquiry to the social and economic factors most profoundly affecting the contemporary American economy: our world is complicated. Our world is so complicated, in fact, that it took more than a year of analysis for economists at the National Bureau of Economic Research to determine that the “Great Recession” ended in June of 2009. Our world is more complicated still: on the very day when such timely news was announced, President Obama met with a roomful of his fellow citizens to talk about our personal economic lives as well as the greater American economy. He began by downplaying NBER’s announcement, stating “obviously for the millions of people who are still out of work, people who have seen their home values decline, people who are struggling to pay the bills day to day, [the recession is] still very real for them.”
What do you expect to happen when you don’t zone headshops?
Unregulated environments sure are a boon to business growth. Colorado Springs is home to more than 100 “medical” marijuana dispensaries. Of course, there is no zoning to ensure that these establishments don’t create problems for their neighbors.
Which is why early Sunday morning, my father received a call from his alarm company alerting him to a break-in. Turns out that while the reinforced door of the pot shop that has opened up next door thwarted four thieves from stealing pot, the drywall between my father’s office and the pot shop was more mailable. Of course, there is no marijuana kept on onsite in Colorado dispensaries, but that doesn’t stop thieves from trying. Reported here and here.
For more than 20 years, my father has practiced medicine at the same location. In all that time his office was never broken into. Nothing had ever been stolen. And parents of young children and the elderly felt safe coming for medical treatment.
Since the headshop opened, healthy-seeming young people have begun loitering outside, smoking tobacco. Someone snuck through his back door to steal his microscope. And now, four guys took a sledge hammer to try and get into the shop next door, discovered that no “medicine” was on site, and helped themselves to a variety of actual medical devices and drugs from my father’s office. And let’s not forget the 4 attempted break-ins since the dispensary opened last year.
Do I think that marijuana may have medical uses? I’m not a doctor, but I’ve been told by doctors that yes, it might. Since the signing of the medical marijuana law in Colorado, my father has even put a handful of patients with on the registry–patients with chronic pain or conditions essentially untreatable by conventional narcotics. Am I opposed to marijuana use? I don’t toke myself, but I thing that the war on drugs is a frightening failure–just like prohibition of alcohol had been–and I think that we should seriously consider legalizing pot. But, is Colorado’s unregulated “medical” experiment a horrible mistake? Absolutely.
There is no medical oversight of patients’ use (unlike, say, a prescription medicine, where you need to check in with your doctor, and which you receive from a trained pharmacist). There is no zoning in anti guv’ment places like the Springs (Pueblo, for example, is taking a cautious approach to zoning so that the problems my father is facing don’t occur). And now my father’s patients, with real problems, may have to reschedule their appointments, because one of the intruders bled over the floor, broke windows and furniture, and left a huge hole in the wall through which a lovely grassy aroma will be delivering contact highs.
Great.
Update: this poorly reasoned piece in the Gazette takes the opposite view. Unfortunately, the numbers don’t seem to support a ‘no correlation’ argument & the police say that there is insufficient data.
Differences of opinion
Exciting Weekend Ahead: The Tea Partiers are Coming
The Tea Partiers are coming, the Tea Partiers are coming!
I am very excited about this opportunity to engage people from outside my narrow-minded neighborhood in intelligent discourse about the role of immigration in contemporary society. I might even get to meet one of those 19-percenters who hope to remove our foreign-born President* from office. (In the interest of full disclosure, I am pretty sure that I was born in Colorado, but I don’t have any newspaper clippings with my birth announcement, so I hope that they can see past my Canadian relatives and that we can talk like real Americans.)
As of right now, I am planning on meeting misguided people at the metro station and politely requesting that they not take advantage of my tax dollars on their way home–they should instead take a pedi-cab or a foreign-oil-fueled vehicle back to their hotels. Because this will only help inform their decisions on the way back, I have submitted a suggestion to Metro to add a special surcharge for all farecard-based travel this Saturday (after all, if someone has a SmartTrip Metro card, they are probably already subsidizing the system with their tax dollars) to offset any tax-payer subsidized taint of the transit system; I don’t want some innocent tea-partier to unknowingly encourage taxation during their visit!
Unfortunately, I have made a grave error in my plans for this weekend. I invited an immigrant. He is a nice guy, but, as an immigrant, he has taken an American job from the lovely people who will be gathering at the Lincoln memorial. Perhaps if I ask him to wear a pin that says “I am a Canadian and I am sorry for taking an American job. If you have a master’s degree in foreign relations, we can discuss how to return what is rightfully yours,” we might be able to get another American employed. It would be unfortunate for my friend to be deported, but one ought to be consistent!
*Normally, I would not footnote what I consider obvious sarcasm respectful disagreement over facts, but in light of the intense debate over this issue, please let me state unequivocally that the Earth is an irregular sphere, Newton’s description of gravity is pretty good for my daily life, and President Obama was born in the United States.
Apple and Ma Bell lose big
Guess what: the Librarian of Congress and the Registrar of Copyrights are going to allow you to jailbreak your iPhones and other locked devices (read: anything on AT&T’s network): go EFF! In addition, it looks like you will be able to move content that you have legally licensed from one device to something new and different–at least in a few circumstances.
Sen. Reid: Let DeMint Filibuster. . .
Why not shorten the Senatorial holiday? Doesn’t the attempted Christmas bombing warrant a vote on the proposed head of the TSA–an individual who has already received bipartisan support from two committees?
And, so what if Sen. DeMint (R-SC) is up in arms about the potential unionization of the TSA? Who cares that he is threatening to filibuster? We should let him. Why? Because filibustering this appointment, to refusing to allow an up or down vote to filling this crucial security position is making our nation unsafe. One might even consider it being soft on terror.
Unionization-puhleez! I didn’t know that it had prevented the first responders on 9/11 from acting. Oh, and Sgt. Munley’s union rep must told her that she wasn’t supposed to get involved at Ft. Hood.
Sen. DeMint should get up to the podium and talk for as long as he can. If he keels over, well: it’s a good thing that his health insurance came with a public option. He’ll get good treatment! Far better than I would, that’s for sure.
A Question for Skeptics
Recently, I have been thinking a lot about skepticism: what does it mean to be skeptical, what makes for legitimate skepticism, etc. I believe that skepticism can be a good and healthy thing–the very act of reasoning out a theory helps a person to better understand that idea, as well as the various values that surround it. As a small child, I marveled at the logistical impracticality that Santa would face in driving his sleigh from house to house, all over the world. What if a kid couldn’t fall asleep–how would Santa detect this state from a distance and reroute his trip on the fly? It simply seemed too far fetched. Eventually I determined that Santa must subcontract with local service providers, a determination that did not in any way impact the joy I felt opening presents on Christmas morning. After all, Santa still knew that I had been relatively good throughout the year. I say relatively, as surely Santa understood the challenge to ‘goodness’ posed by my ever-so-difficult brother.
These days, I am always a little dubious about moral proclamations by politicians. (Me thinks thou dost protest too much.) All too often, those screaming at the top of their lungs (whether Spitzer or Foley, Edwards or Sanford, Haggard) do so because they feel guilty about their own actions and seek redemption through the damnation of others. They simply want to protect their current position.
Like farm conglomerates and the high fructose corn syrup commercials. Or the oil companies and their alternative energy research–the budget for which can be dwarfed by the money they spend advertising such research. Or the alcohol, tobacco, and firearm lobbies and their “have a hell of a lot of fun with our products, but use them responsibly” work.
Fine, I get what they are doing and why they are doing it.
And I get why some people may be skeptical of global climate change. But I don’t understand their reasoning.
